Warm Edge vs Aluminium Spacer
Thermal Bridge Solution

Solve condensation issues and thermal bridging with the right spacer technology. Technical performance explained.

Warm Edge vs Aluminium Spacer Comparison

Technical performance and thermal bridging analysis

Property Warm Edge Spacer Aluminium Spacer
Thermal Conductivity Low (0.1-0.3 W/mK) High (200+ W/mK)
U-Value Improvement 0.1-0.2 W/m²K better Standard
Condensation Risk Significantly reduced Higher risk
Cost Premium £10-20 per window Standard
Energy Savings £30-50/year per window Baseline
Durability 20+ years 20+ years
Payback Period 2-3 years N/A

Condensation Control Technology

How spacer technology affects condensation formation

Aluminium Spacer Issues

High thermal conductivity creates cold spots

Creates thermal bridge between glass panes
Glass edges become cold in winter
Condensation forms around window edges
Higher heat loss through thermal bridge

Warm Edge Solution

Low conductivity materials reduce heat transfer

Minimizes thermal bridging
Keeps glass edges warmer
Prevents edge condensation
Improves overall window U-value

Technical Performance Data

Standard Aluminium

2.0
W/m²K whole window U-value
High condensation risk

Warm Edge Spacer

1.8
W/m²K whole window U-value
Low condensation risk

Performance Gain

10%
Thermal improvement
2-3 year payback

Frequently Asked Questions

Expert answers to warm edge vs aluminium spacer questions

We'll contact you within 2 hours during business hours to arrange your free consultation.

Read full tech spec

Technical details

Get Spec